Template:Did you know nominations/North China Craton
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
North China Craton
[edit]- ...
that every single televisions contain material mined from the North China Craton (map illustrated)? Source:- ALT1:... that rare earth elements from the North China Craton (map illustrated) monopolized the world market for many years? Source:
- Reviewed: Anna Marguerite McCann
- Comment: part of University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2017)
5x expanded by Celiayangyy (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 04:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, long enough (recent 5x expansion), and well referenced. QPQ is done. No copyvio detected. However, both hooks are problematic. I've stricken the main hook as it's not supported by the article. China's REE monopoly is not 100%, as the chart shows, therefore it cannot be concluded that every single TV contains REE from China. ALT1 needs some modification: as written it appears that China had a monopoly but not any more, even though the article says it still enjoys a monopoly. -Zanhe (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- ALT2:... that the North China Craton (map illustrated) was partially destroyed by thinning? Source: Zhu, Ri-Xiang; Yang, Jin-Hui; Wu, Fu-Yuan (2012). "Timing of destruction of the North China Craton"
- ALT3:... that diamonds from the China Diamond Corps' 701 Changma Mine in the North China Craton (map illustrated) are worth $40 per carat?
- Alternatively I could write a hook about gold. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)