Template:Did you know nominations/Nanfeng County
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BlueMoonset (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nanfeng County
- ... that Nanfeng County tangerines are considered one of the best varieties in China?
- ALT1:... that Nanfeng County has seven Danxia landforms?
5x expanded by Ȝeſtikl (talk). Self-nominated at 02:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC).
This article still needs considerable work before it can be featured in DYK. It is new enough and long enough, though I would recommend converting bulleted lists to prose if possible. The maintenance tags (which appear to be added by you) are unquestionably still valid, as those sections currently lack references or content. I cannot comment on the viability of the hooks themselves, as they are both uncited in the article. As verifiability (of both article content and the hooks) is one of the main criteria for eligibility, points 3 and 4 of WP:DYKRULES are not met. Keep working on the article, and feel free to re-nominate after a bit more content expansion and addition of appropriate references, including inline citations for hooks. ComplexRational (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Ȝeſtikl, do you think there is any chance you will be able to expand the short and empty sections, add inline references to all of these sections, and do the considerable work needed so that the maintenance tags are no longer needed? Articles cannot run at DYK with such tags, missing references, or too short or empty sections. The thing is, despite what ComplexRational said, it is unlikely that you would be able to renominate the article, because a further expansion would require another 10,040 prose characters (the article's most recent expansion, to 2,508 prose characters, would need to be 5x expanded again), which strikes me as not practical. Please let us know; if you don't think the work can be done in the next week or two, then the nomination should probably be closed. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, I apologize if what I said was unclear in relation to either work on this hook or continuing expansion. Had expansion continued, there could have been another starting point for the 5x expansion (with a net growth larger than 5x), but another seven days with minimal expansion have passed (a brand new nomination indeed needs another 5x expansion). As you stated, though, this may still be workable if these questions are addressed within the next week or two, so I'd still encourage Ȝeſtikl to take another look at this. I'll gladly re-review in that case. ComplexRational (talk) 19:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- OK. I think you should close the nomination as I do not think that I will be able to address all the issues. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 20:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator has decided to withdraw. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)