Template:Did you know nominations/Muehlenbeckia astonii
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Muehlenbeckia astonii
[edit]- ... that the endangered New Zealand shrub Muehlenbeckia astonii is also known as zig-zag plant and wiggy-wig bush? Source: "It sometimes goes by the names wiggy-wig bush, zig zag plant, wirebrush, shrubby pōhuehue, or mingimingi (a generic term for many small-leaved shrubs)" (Given 2001 and Endangered Species Foundation (n.d.) respectively, cited in article)
- ALT1:... that Muehlenbeckia astonii is a popular garden plant, but is endangered in the wild because many male and female plants are too far apart to cross-pollinate? Source: "In most of the sites it is known from there are only 1–3 old plants, and almost no seedlings: male and female flowers occur on separate plants and need to cross-pollinate, so isolated individuals cannot reproduce. Several small populations show no out-crossing because males and females are too far apart." Muehlenbeckia astonii, Shrubby tororaro (Muehlenbeckia astonii Petrie) recovery plan 2000–2010
5x expanded by Giantflightlessbirds (talk). Self-nominated at 08:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC).
Article has been expanded fivefold, is more than long enough and has no copyvio issues. Both hooks are inline sourced and the user does not need a QPQ review. Good to go. Kosack (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Giantflightlessbirds: Do you want to use the image here? It might work well with ALT0. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I thought about that, but the features of the plant don't show up on 120 x 133 px. Is it against the rules of DYK to use a cropped version of the article image? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Giantflightlessbirds: It's fine to use a cropped image, provided that the cropped image is also used in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I thought about that, but the features of the plant don't show up on 120 x 133 px. Is it against the rules of DYK to use a cropped version of the article image? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Giantflightlessbirds: Do you want to use the image here? It might work well with ALT0. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
