Template:Did you know nominations/Moore-Jackson Cemetery
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Moore-Jackson Cemetery
Moore-Jackson Cemetery
- ... that New York City officials seized the tax-exempt Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) in 1954 for nonpayment of taxes? Source: Greene, Elinor (July 15, 1973). "Wage Fight in Upkeep of Historic Graveyard". Daily News. p. 153.
- ALT1: ... that New York City officials could not explain why they seized the tax-exempt Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) for nonpayment of taxes? Source: Greene, Elinor (July 15, 1973). "Wage Fight in Upkeep of Historic Graveyard". Daily News. p. 153.
- ALT2: ... that a volunteer attempted to put a walkway in the Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) , a New York City landmark, but ran out of materials after 10 feet (3.0 m)? Source: Bergoffen, Celia I. (May 16, 1999). Phase 1A Archaeological Assessment Report (PDF) (Report). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; Queens Historical Society. p. 2
- ALT3: ... that the Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) , a New York City landmark purchased for $1 in 1999, is now a community garden? Source: "Historic Woodside Site Revamped Into Community Garden". LIC Post. January 14, 2022.
- Reviewed: Ross Horning
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC).
- Review by Maile
- QPQ
- Completed
- Eligibility
- 5X expanded by Epicgenius on March 15, 2022
- 12491 characters (2035 words) "readable prose size"
- Sourcing
- Every paragraph is sourced, meeting requirements
- Hooks
- All hooks are appropriate DYK length, and sourced in the article
- Images
- Image is loaded on Commons and licensed
- Copyvio check
- No issues, checked via Earwig's tool
- @Maile66: Thanks for the review. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Approved. — Maile (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P6 without image