Talk:Moore-Jackson Cemetery

A fact from Moore-Jackson Cemetery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that New York City officials seized the tax-exempt Moore-Jackson Cemetery in 1954 for nonpayment of taxes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Moore-Jackson Cemetery.

Wikipedia

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Moore-Jackson Cemetery

... that New York City officials seized the tax-exempt Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) in 1954 for nonpayment of taxes? Source: Greene, Elinor (July 15, 1973). "Wage Fight in Upkeep of Historic Graveyard". Daily News. p. 153.
- ALT1: ... that New York City officials could not explain why they seized the tax-exempt Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) for nonpayment of taxes? Source: Greene, Elinor (July 15, 1973). "Wage Fight in Upkeep of Historic Graveyard". Daily News. p. 153.
- ALT2: ... that a volunteer attempted to put a walkway in the Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) , a New York City landmark, but ran out of materials after 10 feet (3.0 m)? Source: Bergoffen, Celia I. (May 16, 1999). Phase 1A Archaeological Assessment Report (PDF) (Report). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; Queens Historical Society. p. 2
- ALT3: ... that the Moore-Jackson Cemetery (pictured) , a New York City landmark purchased for $1 in 1999, is now a community garden? Source: "Historic Woodside Site Revamped Into Community Garden". LIC Post. January 14, 2022.
- Reviewed: Ross Horning

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Review by Maile

QPQ

Completed

Eligibility

5X expanded by Epicgenius on March 15, 2022
12491 characters (2035 words) "readable prose size"

Sourcing

Every paragraph is sourced, meeting requirements

Hooks

All hooks are appropriate DYK length, and sourced in the article

Images

Image is loaded on Commons and licensed

Copyvio check

No issues, checked via Earwig's tool

@Maile66: Thanks for the review. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. — Maile (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC) To T:DYK/P6 without image[reply]