Template:Did you know nominations/Macombs Dam Bridge
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Macombs Dam Bridge
- ... that the swing span of Macombs Dam Bridge was considered the world's heaviest movable mass at the time of its construction? Source: NYCLPC p. 2
- ALT1:... that New York City's Macombs Dam Bridge, a swing bridge, was originally the site of an actual dam? Source: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/infrastructure/bridges-harlem.shtml#macombs
- Reviewed: Michigan Stove Company
- Comment: More hooks to come later
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC).
- I will be reviewing this. At first glance this already seems more than long enough
and passes the 5x expansion mark. I'll look at the rest later, and evaluate hooks when you have them. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- John M Wolfson, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Will do, hope you feel better! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- John M Wolfson, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- I will be reviewing this. At first glance this already seems more than long enough
The article seems neutral enough and Earwig's tool does not return any copyvios. ALT0 is directly stated in the article and verified by the source given. (I'm not so sure that ALT1 is expressly stated in the body of the article; ALT0 is better in my opinion, anyway.) QPQ appears adequate. Overall, I see no problems with ALT0, and can approve them if you don't feel like making more. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- John M Wolfson, thanks for the review. I think other hooks can technically be made, but they wouldn't be as interesting. For instance:
- ALT2 ... that the Macombs Dam Bridge, called "a beautiful piece of engineering work", was featured in an Edward Hopper painting? "The Harlem River: The Beginning of a Developing Movement in which the City May Take Pride"; LPC p. 8 epicgenius (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that the Macombs Dam Bridge, called "a beautiful piece of engineering work", was featured in an Edward Hopper painting? "The Harlem River: The Beginning of a Developing Movement in which the City May Take Pride"; LPC p. 8 epicgenius (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- John M Wolfson, thanks for the review. I think other hooks can technically be made, but they wouldn't be as interesting. For instance:
