Template:Did you know nominations/Ljubiša Preletačević
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Vanamonde (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ljubiša Preletačević, Sarmu probo nisi
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the fictional character Ljubiša Preletačević, whose mock party Sarmu probo nisi has advocated euthanizing pensioners, is a candidate in the 2017 Serbian presidential election? Source: "Potpuno ludilo u Srbiji: protiv Vučića se kandidirao izmišljeni lik Ljubiša Preletačević Beli...", "Kao udarnu točku političkog programa najavili su da će u mladenovačkoj bolnici otvoriti dvoranu za eutanaziju..." [1]
- Comment: I am not clear if I should do a QPQ for nominations of articles written by someone else. Can someone enlighten me, please? Also, does this break the rule election candidates rule? The hook does not really promote anyone.
Created by Vanjagenije (talk) and AirWolf (talk). Nominated by Surtsicna (talk) at 13:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC).
- Comment: two QPQs will be required of Surtsicna: one per nominated article. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Reviewing these two articles; Sarmu probo nisi was created first and is new enough but not quite long enough, being 1384 characters where 1500 are required. Ljubiša Preletačević was started two days later and incorporates some of the text from the first article. I calculate it is 3261 characters, which makes it long enough, even if all of the first article had been incorporated. The articles are neutral and the sources are in languages I do not speak, so the hook facts are accepted in good faith. If "Ljubiša Preletačević Beli" was eliminated in the first round of voting, I don't think there is any restriction on the date when this nomination can run. So "Sarmu probo nisi" needs to be lengthened a trifle and two QPQs need to be done for this to move forwards. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
It has been over a month since Surtsicna has edited on Wikipedia. The QPQs have still not been provided, and one of the nominated articles is still not long enough. Marking for closure as unsuccessful, though of course if the QPQs are provided and the article expanded (or being expanded) before this closes, the nomination can continue. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
