Template:Did you know nominations/Little Roaring Brook
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Little Roaring Brook
[edit]- ... that a site along Little Roaring Brook has prehistoric archaeological significance?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 00:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC).
- Nicely done! Article is new enough (one-day old at time of nomination). Article is long enough (~5400 chars). Article is written in a neutral manner. The hook meets formatting and content guidelines (short, interesting). The hook fact is directly attributable to a reliable source. Each paragraph within the article body is well-cited, and no instances of copyvio found therein. No photograph to check re copyvio. QPQ complate. Ready for mainpage exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)