Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Cooper
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Laura Cooper
... that U.S. Department of Defense civil servant Laura Cooper (pictured) described the Russian intervention in Ukraine as "a brazen violation of international law" after Russia attacked Ukrainian vessels in late 2018?
- Reviewed: Carrots and Sticks
Created by Mwinog2777 (talk). Nominated by Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) at 23:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC).
- This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. @Coffeeandcrumbs: A QPQ needs to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: done. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. This nomination is good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: I have changed "diplomat" to "civil servant" as that is a more accurate description for her position. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 04:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I keep coming by to promote this, but keep passing it by because the hook seems rather obvious: wouldn't someone who works in the State Department say such a thing? Perhaps you can provide a hookier fact. Yoninah (talk) 22:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth and Yoninah: ALT 1 ... that U.S. Department of Defense civil servant Laura Cooper (pictured) has noted that she has frequently "been the only woman in the room" for much of her career? --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Approving ALT 1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. @Coffeeandcrumbs: A QPQ needs to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)