Template:Did you know nominations/Langenstraße (Bremen)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Ohc ¡digame! 16:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Langenstraße (Bremen)
[edit]... that the importance of Langenstraße in Bremen, first mentioned in 1234, still counts?
Created by Ipigott (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 17:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC).
- unrequired QPQ is Quad Electrostatic Loudspeaker
I don't really understand the suggested hook and it will not do anyway because the 1234 date is not cited. How about: Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
ALT1 ... that many of the 19th century residences in Langenstraße in Bremen were destroyed during World War II but have been carefully reconstructed since?
- It was meant to be a pun but your Alt is OK. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 12:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- OK, I get it, but its a bit abstruse. If using ALT1, someone else needs to re-review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think there was a minor misunderstanding in ALT1 as the buildings in question span several centuries. I therefore propose:
- ALT2 ... that many of the historic buildings in Langenstraße in Bremen were seriously damaged during World War II but have been carefully reconstructed since? --Ipigott (talk) 07:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
ALT2 is fine and has an appropriate inline citation. The article is new enough and long enough and otherwise complies with the DYK criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
