The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 00:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Overall: The ALT1 hook is very hooky: involvement of introduced species as article of diet William Avery (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
William Avery, I have corrected the typo. I am not sure if I was supposed to create another hook, so I just edited the existing one. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I also realize that ALT 1 might not make sense. I should probably also include how the round goby accounts for 90% of the snake's diet. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Scorpions13256 My feeling was that the reader who asks "How so?" would be encouraged to click through. I have removed my comment about the typo ('Typo makes ALT1 hook conflicts with citation. The ALT1 hook should be "the 23rd animal", not "the 63rd animal".') from the {{DYK checklist}} above. Feel free to propose another hook for me to approve, or let me know that I can give this a green tick as it stands. William Avery (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)