Template:Did you know nominations/Keine Kameraden

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Keine Kameraden

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Keine Kameraden (1978) on the Soviet prisoners of war was said to "necessitate revision ... to all previous books on the Russo-German war"? Source: https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2615767
  • ALT1 ... that in 1978, the findings of Keine Kameraden that 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war died of ideologically motivated mistreatment caused a sensation in Germany?
  • ALT2 ... that more than thirty years later, the first major study on the 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war who died in German custody of ideologically motivated mistreatment caused a sensation in Germany?

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sociedad Cosmopolita de Resistencia y Colocación de Obreros Panaderos
  • Comment: Alternate suggestions welcome

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 21:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Keine Kameraden; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Article has just been created and is long enough. There are no images. Text is clear, neutral, and cited to excellent sources (ref [2] Förster isn't correctly formatted, but not an issue here). On the hook, which is rather long, I'm not sure I can word one exactly; but Streit indicated that the mishandling of prisoners, and many deaths (half a million handed to the SS to be murdered) were deliberate, even genocidal (ref [3]): surely we can have a stronger and more pertinent hook which alludes to this. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. Provided a few alts (t · c) buidhe 14:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Happy with Alt1, let's go with that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)