The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 03:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Overall: Article new enough, long enough, and passes earwig. NYT source is paywalled, but other citations in the article support otherwise. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Suggestion, maybe replace the second mention of Kentucky and replace with state or set a new rainfall record there to avoid repetition. Nom good to go otherwise. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
@Pseud 14: thanks for the suggestion! Have tweaked the hook. :) TailsWx 16:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Record in KY is preliminary until vetted by the NCEI, which is unlikely until 2024. As such I added preliminary.72.68.134.254 (talk) 22:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC) (Striking comment from blocked SOCK. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Article new enough, long enough, and passes earwig. NYT source is paywalled, but other citations in the article support otherwise. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Suggestion, maybe replace the second mention of Kentucky and replace with state or set a new rainfall record there to avoid repetition. Nom good to go otherwise. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)