Template:Did you know nominations/Jozef Israëls Monument

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Jozef Israëls Monument

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Jozef Israëls Monument

• ... that in 1943 the Jozef Israëls Monument (pictured) was destroyed by fascists but the director of municipal cleaning saved the pieces and it was restored? Source: During the Second World War, the work was severely damaged. Jozef Israëls was Jewish, which members of the Dutch National Socialist Movement stated on his statue in the spring of 1943 and (August 10, 1946 Unveiling monument) It was the director of Municipal Cleaning, Mr. Koops, who immediately took charge of the shards. After the liberation, the restoration was started under the direction of van den Groninger sculptor S. W. Valk.
  • ALT1: ... that the Jozef Israëls Monument (pictured) which was destroyed during World War II was rebuilt after the war? Source: Same as ALT0
  • ALT2: ... that a monument (pictured) to honor the Jewish artist Jozef Israëls was destroyed during World War II but someone saved the pieces and it was restored and unveiled in 1946? Source: Same as ALT0
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Beautiful Letdown

Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 16:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jozef Israëls Monument; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Bruxton: Good article. AGF on Foreign sources. Waiting on QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: Thank you for the review. Not sure why I forgot to add the QPQ but I just did now. Bruxton (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)