Template:Did you know nominations/Joachim III of Bulgaria
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Joachim III of Bulgaria
[edit]- ... that in 1300, the Bulgarian Patriarch Joachim III was charged with treason and executed by the newly crowned Emperor Theodore Svetoslav?
Created by Gligan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC).
- Gligan
Article conforms to DYK rules. Hook is interesting, cited and verified. No copy vio noted. Text is neutral. QPQ not done. Please confirm if you have less than 5 QPQs to your credit so that I can give a green tick. Nvvchar. 08:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what QPQ means but if its number is determined by the "QPQ check" on the DYK toolbox, then it is 8. Regards, Gligan (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry about it. I mean how many DYKs do you have to your credit. If it is more than five and then you have to review another article as QPQ and report it here under comment.Nvvchar. 06:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar and Gligan: just for the record, it is the reviewer, as part of the basic review process, who is supposed to check on how many previous DYKs a nominator has. You can do that with the QPQ check found on the DYK Toolbox at the top of all review templates.— Maile (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Gligan
- @Gligan: I have checked and you have had 5 or more DYK credits from articles you have nominated, and so according to the rules at WP:QPQ, you are required to review another DYK submission and note which one on each nomination you make. The rule was introduced to help improve reviewing and to help submitters see articles from a different perspective. I'm not sure why you weren't alerted on your 6th nomination, but the rule does exist. Feel free to contact me or Maile66 or someone at WT:DYK if you need some help with doing your first review. Thanks. EdChem (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar, Maile66, and EdChem: Thank you all for your patience and advice. I have reviewed an article and have inserted a link to that article above. I was indeed unaware of that QPQ rule and I guess I haven't been alerted previously because my last DYK nomination was quite some time ago. Regards, Gligan (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
. Now that qpq has been done article is good to go.Nvvchar. 13:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar, Maile66, and EdChem: Thank you all for your patience and advice. I have reviewed an article and have inserted a link to that article above. I was indeed unaware of that QPQ rule and I guess I haven't been alerted previously because my last DYK nomination was quite some time ago. Regards, Gligan (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
