Jump to content

Talk:Joachim III of Bulgaria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joachim III of Bulgaria/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk · contribs) 18:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm starting this review. I'll see if I can finish it later today. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article presents valuable information about an important person in Bulgarian medieval history. It's possible that English-language sources of this depth don't even exist. I admire the research and translation that went into making this page.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I had a difficult time finding any information on Joachim III outside of this page. His name did come up in a book of medival Bulgarian letters and in a book called Bulgaria's Map Comes to Life, so I have no reason to doubt the page's information. I wasn't able to check most of the sources, since they are print and in Bulgarian. No copvios. References are good. The material is complicated, but there is enough historical context that I could follow most of the information. No original research, the page is stable, and the pictures all have enough information and are relevant.

The only problem I have is that the lead doesn't summarize the article, and it contains some information that isn't in the main body of the article, or if it is, it is unclear to me.

  • -"It seems that Joachim remained loyal to the position of the Tarnovo Patriarchate, which explains his quick rise in the church hierarchy"--maybe this is a dumb question, but is the Tarnovov Patriarchate always in Tarnovo, as the lead mentions his seat was located?
Firstly, I would like to thank you very much for reviewing the article. Regarding the question: The Bulgarian Patriarchate is often called the Tarnovo Patriarchate when referring to its period of existence during the Second Empire (1185-1396), and during all that time the seat was in Tarnovo. I guess this would be confusing for most readers and therefore changed the wording to "Bulgarian Patriarchate" instead of "Tarnovo Patriarchate", while keeping the link. --Gligan (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • -"his name was included in the list of Bulgarian Patriarchs in the Book of Boril" - from the lead and not listed in the body. Is this the same as the "litanies" in his honor?
I added that piece of information. Best regards, --Gligan (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the article, I've decided to put it on hold, just because of those two issues with the lead. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great, the page meets the GA criteria. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joachim III of Bulgaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]