Template:Did you know nominations/International Association of Applied Linguistics

 The following is an archived discussion of International Association of Applied Linguistics's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

International Association of Applied Linguistics

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the journal Applied Linguistics is published by Oxford University Press, with help from the British, American and International Associations of Applied Linguistics?

Created by Mr. Stradivarius (talk). Self nom at 15:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

• Note - the citation for the hook is in the "publications" section, and the reference is available at Questia (p. 732) for people who have accounts there. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 15:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

• ALT1 ... that the International Association of Applied Linguistics holds a World Congress every three years? — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  This hook is probably better than the journal one - it's more central to the activity of the association, and it's shorter. The citation is in the "Activities" section, and it's the same Questia source that I posted the link to above. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  Reviewed: David Pendleton (diff) — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

• I do like Alt1 better, also. QPQ done. New article, long enough and well cited. Hook info sourced with offline reference I don't have access to. But other info seems correct per the other cites I could check. So WP:AGF. I corrected some overciting on the page. Everything else looks fine, though. Thank you for your work. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)