Template:Did you know nominations/Harta Berdarah
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Harta Berdarah
[edit]... that Union Films' Harta Berdarah was advertised as a beautiful action film?- ALT1 ... that Union Films' action film Harta Berdarah was released during Eid?
- Reviewed: People's Park (Nanning)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 11:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC).
- (edit conflict) Date, size, refs, all fine. I'd however propose a more clear ALT2, below. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that Union Films' Harta Berdarah, advertised as a "beautiful Indonesian action film", was released during Eid al-Fitr holiday of 1940?
- Wow, y'all are rushing. Will get to double referencing the eid date, and bother Drmies about "schlager". — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- OK--the article from the De Indische courant, 01-11-1940, says "ware en waarheidsgetrouwe film", a "true and realistic film". "Indonesische film-schlager" is cited from the Soerabaijasch handelsblad (29-10-1940), but that's an ad for the movie and I wouldn't cite it. "Schlager" in this context means something like "hit", but again, it's an ad. Sorry, I know I'm raining on someone's parade. Drmies (talk) 14:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Drmies, it's being used to say "the film was advertised as". Valid use of an advertisement. Hit here being box-office hit? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- OK. Yes, "box-office hit", that's fair. But "prachtig"--maybe "magnificent" is more better. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- I like that. This is why you're the doctor and I'm but a lowly M.A. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note to reviewers: I've edited ALT1 above. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- OK. Yes, "box-office hit", that's fair. But "prachtig"--maybe "magnificent" is more better. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Drmies, it's being used to say "the film was advertised as". Valid use of an advertisement. Hit here being box-office hit? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)