The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
... that the New South WalesGovernor's Body Guard of Light Horse appears to have been absent when Governor William Bligh was arrested during the Rum Rebellion? "It is a matter for conjecture where the members of the Body Guard were when the mutineers of the NSW Corps stormed into Government House, Sydney, on 26 January 1808, to place Governor Bligh under arrest. No doubt, as members of the NSW Corps' the Bodyguard's loyalties lay with the mutineers rather than the governor, perhaps they were discretely absent." from Sargent, Clem (1998), "The Governor's Body Guard of Light Horse", Sabretache : The Journal of the Military Collectors Society of Australia, vol. 39, no. 2 (page 7)
ALT1:... that Governor of New South Wales Lachlan Macquarie "felt very much hurt" for being "singled out as Undeserving this Honor" when ordered to disband his personal bodyguard? "The Secretary of State for the Colonies, the Earl of Liverpool, directed not an increase but its disbandment ... [Macquarie] "felt very much hurt" that as the first military governor of the colony he should have been "singled out as Undeserving this Honor". from Sargent, Clem (1998), "The Governor's Body Guard of Light Horse", Sabretache : The Journal of the Military Collectors Society of Australia, vol. 39, no. 2 (page 8)
ALT2: ... that the Governor's Body Guard of Light Horse has been described as the the first full-time military unit raised in Australia?"it can be described as the the first full-time military unit raised in Australia". from Sargent, Clem (1998), "The Governor's Body Guard of Light Horse", Sabretache : The Journal of the Military Collectors Society of Australia, vol. 39, no. 2 (page 12)
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 06:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC).
If it is OK to present a conjecture rather than a fact, then I prefer the original to the ALTs as it seems the "hookiest". The review below is for the first hook and first image only.
Overall: In the hook, I have changed "appear" to "appears" as the Guard is a single entity, and "captured" to "arrested" to match the wording of the article. If the nominator agrees then this DYK is good to go. ~ RLO1729💬 03:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi RLO1729, thanks for your review. Your changes to the hook are fine by me (I've commented on the article talk page about this being an example of the varied treatment of collective nouns in British English but am happy for the usage to be standardised) - Dumelow (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Great, this DYK is good to go! ~ RLO1729💬 06:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)