Template:Did you know nominations/Gibraltar F.C.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yngvadottir (talk) 05:10, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Gibraltar F.C.
[edit]
- ... that Gibraltar F.C. (team in 1895 pictured) was one of the first civilian football clubs established in Gibraltar?
- Reviewed: Walthamstow by-election, 1910
Created/expanded by The C of E (talk). Self nom at 11:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- REVIEW COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Maile66
- QPQ done by C of E on September 18, 2012
- Article created by C of E on September 20,, 2012 and has 1,504 characters of readable prose
- NPOV, no COI, article is about a football club
- Every paragraph sourced
- Hook is interesting, short enough and appropriately sourced
- Hook image is on Commons as "Public Domain"
- Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
GOOD 2 GO, Maile66 (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Followup checks carried out by self. Length, date and sources are all fine. It's a pity the article doesn't say when the club was dissolved - any chance of adding this info? (though it's not essential for the purposes of this review). Prioryman (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- I wish I could but I'm afraid I couldn't find when it was dissolved. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- How come no reviewer has spotted even the basics, such as "Footbal" in the infobox? Are reviewers not required to read the whole article? Malleus Fatuorum 18:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please be sensible - a trivial typo doesn't disqualify a DYK. I'm glad to see you've fixed it. Prioryman (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Imagine having to defend yourself over something like a miniscule typo. But I will. By the date and time I made my review, against the article's history, the "Full name" part of the infobox where that typo appeared, wasn't even on there. The typo was inserted with an edit after my review. However, it was a minor typo and nothing more. Glass houses and yadda yadda yadda. — Maile66 (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC)