Template:Did you know nominations/George Charles Hoste
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
George Charles Hoste
.jpg)
The Spartan taking the Sparviere in tow
- ... that on 3 May 1810 George Charles Hoste took charge of the quarter-deck guns of the Spartan frigate in the Bay of Naples, defended her against a French squadron, and took the brig Sparvière as a prize? Source: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography,_1901_supplement/Hoste,_George_Charles
Created by Ficaia (talk). Self-nominated at 13:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC).
Everything checks out fully: QPQ done, new enough, definitely long enough, article sourcing seems accurate, hook is well-sourced and short enough, and hook is decently interesting (though I might have gone with something about him accidentally killing his brother). Image is a tad wanting at that size but that's subjective; no copyright concerns with the image for obvious reasons. Outstanding article, nice job. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ficaia and Pbritti:
while public domain text is allowed in DYK articles, it doesn't count towards the 1500-byte character minimum – by my count, this article would be only at 1000B. Could that be brought higher? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Would adjusting the text to be not a copy-and-paste of the public domain material be acceptable? If that's insufficient, I can probably scrounge up some more details. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: yep, standard copyvio rules apply; if you say it in your own words, it'll count. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Leeky. I'll ping when I've wrapped that up; hopefully Ficaia will also do a pass. Thanks for your repeated patience and thoroughness. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Excellent, please do :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 07:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Leeky. I'll ping when I've wrapped that up; hopefully Ficaia will also do a pass. Thanks for your repeated patience and thoroughness. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: yep, standard copyvio rules apply; if you say it in your own words, it'll count. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Would adjusting the text to be not a copy-and-paste of the public domain material be acceptable? If that's insufficient, I can probably scrounge up some more details. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ficaia and Pbritti:
@Ficaia: Any movement on this? If the article doesn't meet the length requirement in a week, I think we should probably close. Also, for anyone passing by, rephrasing a bunch of public-domain text already in the article is a pretty easy way to pick up a DYK credit... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 07:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Pbritti and I have been working on it. I'll try and add/change some more. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Ficaia did some additions and rewording in mid to late December. Do you think the changes are sufficient to pass this? 97198 (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. A lot of the attempts to rephrase wind up being WP:CLOP, and most of the new additions are just citations, which don't count. I'm going to suggest that if the changes aren't made within a week, the nomination should be marked for closure. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: By my count, there are 1000-odd characters in the lead, also I've added about 300 characters to the body from 2 sources I added, and Pbritti has done some rephrasing. As this is very nearly ready, please don't mark it for closure. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 04:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ficaia: Parts of the lead throw Earwig flags as well, make sure you get those. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: By my count, there are 1000-odd characters in the lead, also I've added about 300 characters to the body from 2 sources I added, and Pbritti has done some rephrasing. As this is very nearly ready, please don't mark it for closure. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 04:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. A lot of the attempts to rephrase wind up being WP:CLOP, and most of the new additions are just citations, which don't count. I'm going to suggest that if the changes aren't made within a week, the nomination should be marked for closure. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Ficaia did some additions and rewording in mid to late December. Do you think the changes are sufficient to pass this? 97198 (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Alllll righty! Looks like we've got an expansion done; Pbritti, want to do a re-review given the new content? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)