Template:Did you know nominations/Geodorcus servandus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Geodorcus servandus

(

)

... that the flightless stag beetle, Geodorcus servandus was discovered on the summit of just one mountain in New Zealand in 1960 and is unable to fly elsewhere...?Source: [1] or (if not working like at present) [2]
- ALT1:... that the stag beetle, Geodorcus servandus is unable to fly, and so far is only known to occur on just one mountain top in New Zealand...?Source: [3]

Created by Markanderson72 (talk). Nominated by Markanderson72 (talk) at 10:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC).

Article does not meet the minimum 1500 characters of readable prose.
Currently: Prose size (text only): 1420 characters (234 words) "readable prose size". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, this is my first nomination, will increase prose today. Appreciate the feedbackMarkanderson72 (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I have now extended the article on behalf of the creator/nominator and it exceeds the minimum length, so is now eligible for consideration. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: All looks fine to me. I'd say it's good to go with either hook. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, BrownHairedGirl. I've struck the first hook for reasons relating to the date of discovery (which I now realise is not strictly true as it stands), thus leaving ALT1 as the preferred one to use. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Nick Moyes. I should have caught the hook error myself. Glad you stepped in. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Nick Moyes and BrownHairedGirl, appreciate your time on this. I should have spotted error too! Named in 2007, first collected in 1960! Should I change the first hook?Markanderson72 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@Markanderson72: I have just corrected it and unstruck it. Hope that is OK with Nick Moyes. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely fine with me. Think I stil prefer ALT1, though. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)