The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Apologies for the inconsistencies. I found another source that could replace the one I used prior that I think could work better and hopefully lessen the risk of the hook being contested. I wish the previous hooks to be scraped and opt for the one below.
Overall: @Abacusada: Good article. The other hooks could work as a possible alternate though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your review, Onegreatjoke! I thought "likely the first" from the first source might draw troubles for this nomination, so I offered another alternative. Glad to know that it would work anyway. – Abacusada (t • c) 12:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)