Template:Did you know nominations/Geistliche Gesänge, Op. 110
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Geistliche Gesänge, Op. 110
[edit]- ... that Max Reger's three sacred motets for up to eight voices Geistliche Gesänge, Op. 110, were composed in different years at different places for different choirs?
- Reviewed: Ferruccio Busoni
5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 22:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 114 chars to 1619 chars since 07:53, 07 June 2016 (UTC), a 14.20-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1619 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 7.4%. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 160 characters
- ✓ Gerda Arendt has 864 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Ferruccio Busoni was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, you saw what the bot said. Hook fact is in the article and cited. No close paraphrasing found. No image to check. No copyvio found. Good to go. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
