Template:Did you know nominations/Football trafficking
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Football trafficking
- ... that according to multiple sources, thousands of football players are trafficked every year? Source: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/soccers-lost-boys-world-c_b_609171 "It’s estimated that 20,000 young West African players are currently stranded throughout Europe—trafficked there by predatory agents" https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/may/16/football-broken-dreams-african-teenagers-sold-premier-league-lie-nepal "They follow an exodus of tens of thousands of African players" and "most – up to 80%, according to the players – shelled out thousands of dollars to a shady network of “agents” " https://geographical.co.uk/people/development/item/2817-football-trafficking "Trafficking: 15,000 (est.) trafficked players entering Europe annually"
- ALT1: ... that according to multiple sources, football trafficking affects thousands of young players every year?
- Same sources as ALT0.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ibrahim Omer
- Comment: Brooke Van Velden was the actual article I reviewed
Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 16:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC).
- Date and length fine. The 20,000 claim is more than enough for me to accept the thousands claim in the hook which is cited inline. QPQ done, no close paraphrasing. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, The C of E! —valereee (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man, how would you feel about removing the 'according to multiple sources' from these hooks? —valereee (talk) 20:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I think it could easily be removed, the claim itself is verifiable by using multiple sources so no worries from my point of view. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 20:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man, how would you feel about removing the 'according to multiple sources' from these hooks? —valereee (talk) 20:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, The C of E! —valereee (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- ALT0a: ... that thousands of football players are trafficked every year?
- ALT1a: ... that football trafficking affects thousands of young players every year?
- —valereee (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)