The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. Passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, straightforward, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)