Template:Did you know nominations/Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 18:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut

(

)

... that, after the release of Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut, the original film was described as being the first "flop" to be given a director's cut?

Reviewed: Gerald Williams (tennis commentator)

Moved to mainspace by A Thousand Doors (talk). Self-nominated at 18:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems: - the wording might be tighter. I'll suggest an ALT

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I liked the original but haven't seen the director's cut. The article indicates that it's not as good so it's definitely not too promotional. Andrew D. (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that Donnie Darko was described as being the first flop to be given a director's cut?
- I'd have no real objection to that phrasing, my only concern would be that it would violate WP:EGG – a reader could reasonably expect that clicking the bold link will take them to the Director's cut article, when in actuality it won't at all. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)