The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, and well sourced. QPQ done. Spot check revealed no obvious plagiarism. Hook is cited, interesting, and of an appropriate length. This appears to be good to go. CanadianPaul 13:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)