The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC).
The taxonomy of Cinara cupressi seems to need more clarificaton, as the article currently lists the middle east as the origin of the species/species group, but the sources do not agree on that.--Kevmin§ 17:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
It would indeed be nice if the taxonomy was clearer, but the present state of the article is about the best that I can do; it is a start class article waiting for someone with more knowledge or better access to suitable sources to improve. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Your referecne 4 Invasive Species Compendium gives a decent overview of the situation, and is what I was looking at when I asked for more information in the taxonomy section of the article. It looks like the article isnt accurate to the sources at this point.--Kevmin§ 18:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
@Kevmin: I have partially rewritten the Taxonomy section. Any better? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Overall: Both articles look good to go now, the small issues of the taxonomy and close paraphrasing have be resolved. Kevmin§ 16:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Both articles look good to go now, the small issues of the taxonomy and close paraphrasing have be resolved. Kevmin § 16:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)