Template:Did you know nominations/Cyclone Winifred
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Ohc ¡digame! 09:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cyclone Winifred
[edit]
- ...
that Cyclone Winifred (pictured) was the first tropical cyclone in 14 years to significantly impact northern Australia?
- ALT1:... that Cyclone Winifred (pictured) was the most severe tropical cyclone to strike northern Queensland since Cyclone Althea in 1971?
- Reviewed: Didemnum molle
- Comment: Moved to mainspace from userspace sandbox, definitely long enough, both hooks (main and alt) cited immediately afterward, within policy/well-referenced, QPQ'd already as noted.
Moved to mainspace by Cloudchased (talk). Self nominated at 00:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC).
I'm about to do a DYK on a weather related article myself! So I've been following this article during the sandbox phase. Everything checks out. I slightly prefer ALT1, as "significantly impact" is a little vague. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was a bit concerned about that myself; to the folks working with the DYK stuff: please use alt1 (the hook with Cyclone Althea) per above. Thanks for the quick review! Cloudchased (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm not questioning the review as such, but the above commentary is a bit too cursory. Kindly write a fuller review commentary that elaborates on specifically what you have checked. Regrds, -- Ohc ¡digame! 03:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I checked the source through Lexis-Nexis, which verified the hook, and I've checked the various sources to ensure there are no copyvios. I've been following the progress of the article all along, so I know it's quality. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)