The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
ALT4: ... that the New York City government rejected one plan to redevelop City Pier A because the developer wanted to buy a boat? Source: Marinaccio, Paul (October 21, 1988). "LI Firm to Renovate NY Pier". Newsday. p. 51.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC).
@Epicgenius: Dibs on this review. Waiting on a QPQ before I proceed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Nuts! This one looks too cool. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke: Sorry for the long wait. I've done a QPQ now.
@Pbritti: Yeah, this is quite an interesting subject. I really enjoyed researching the topic, even though I had it on my radar more than three years ago. Better late than never, I guess... Epicgenius (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Overall: @Epicgenius: Great expansion! I will have to assume good faith on the sources I can't access and proceed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
@Epicgenius: I'm concerned that the source for ALT0 (The New York Times) isn't willing to put the statement in their own voice – do we want to attribute inline as well? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron: Thanks for pointing this out. I've added inline attribution for that statement now. Epicgenius (talk) 00:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron: I've now proposed ALT0A (actually, I proposed this in my previous comment but forgot to mention it until now). Epicgenius (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I'll just go ahead and promote this nomination, given that ALT0a is very similar to ALT0, and I don't think just adding attribution merits another review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)