Template:Did you know nominations/Cincinnati Marine Hospital

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Cincinnati Marine Hospital

(

)

The first Cincinnati Marine Hospital building in 1896

... that the first Cincinnati Marine Hospital (pictured) was taken by the military, and the second by environmental health scientists? Source: [1] [2]

Reviewed: Eluru outbreak

5x expanded by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 23:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC).

Hello @John P. Sadowski (NIOSH):, I notice that the supplied QPQ has been deleted. Do you have any idea why or could you elaborate what was on the review? I figure we can assume good faith that a review was done? I plan on doing a full review later today or tomorrow. Cheers. Flibirigit (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Flibirigit and John P. Sadowski (NIOSH): Sorry, I tagged the page for deletion by mistake. It should be restored now. MSG17 (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I will complete a review of Cincinnati Marine Hospital later today or tomorrow. Flibirigit (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - ?
Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Overall, the article is in good condition, and I have only one minor question. The article is new enought since it was created from a disambiguation page on December 18 and nominated for DYK the next day. Length is adequate. Article meets all sourcing requirements. Article is neutral in tone. No plagiarism issues detected. Both images used in the article are properly licensed on the Commons. The nominated image is clear at a low resolution, used in the article, and enhances the hook. QPQ requirement has been completed. The hook is interesting and clever. My only concern here is that article specifically states "Department of War" whereas the first part of the hook says "the military". While these are related, I can foresee readers not equating an office to the actual armed service. Is there a more similar wording that could be used? Flibirigit (talk) 22:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Flibirigit: Good point. How about this? John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that the first Cincinnati Marine Hospital (pictured) was taken by the Department of War, and the second by environmental health scientists?

ALT1 is approved as interesting, mentioned in the article, and verified by the sources provided. The article adheres to all other DYK criteia. Flibirigit (talk) 00:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)