The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Overall: The "favorable reviews" of his research could use some expansion—that's four citations yet only one sentence—but that's just my own opinion and isn't a DYK requirement, seeing it already passes the minimum article length. Unless anyone has any other concerns or I missed something, this should be good to go. AdoTang (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)