The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightbursttalk 19:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
... that Catherine, Princess of Wales(pictured), is a keen amateur photographer and has taken many official photographs of her children?
ALT1: ...that Catherine, Princess of Wales(pictured), is known for her fashion sense and has been listed as one of the most influential people in the fashion industry?
Reviewed:
Comment: She is the future Queen and her article has been only recently improved to GA status. Hence this nomination for it to appear on DYK
Overall: @MSincccc: could you confirm if this is only your 2nd DYK? Also do you want to use to the infobox image? Would potentially make a good DYK photo. No QPQ needed. Paraphrasing dealt with. nom approved. Seddontalk 02:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
@Seddon: Yes this is my second DYK nomination. Also I am not against the use of the infobox portrait as the DYK photo. Even I believe its a good one to use. Also hoping that this hook appears on the Main Page in January on the occasion of her birthday.
@MSincccc: if you can do the copyedit and also propose a caption for the photo (added above) then we should be good to go. Seddontalk 13:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
@Seddon: This image is from a pre-Coronation reception attended by the senior working royals in May. But if you are thinking of a suitable caption for DYK, then "Catherine in 2023" will be most accurate lest you have any other means to make the caption more viable. Regards MSincccc
@Seddon: I could have mentioned these details (of her being patron) in my original hook but found them to be extraneous hence omitted them. Anyways you know best hence we can proceed with this as a second alternative.
It says 20% so violation is unlikely. MSincccctalk 03:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
@MSincccc: if you could still rewrite the associated text as its a very clear lift from a copyrighted source. Seddontalk 04:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
@Seddon:In the article or in the nomination that is the ALT? I don't see any problem with the wordings in the article since it has only been upgraded to GA status this past week and we did remove sources and rewrite material which were not required as such. By the way, I hope the review is successful soon so that the hook can appear on the Main Page on Jan 9 on her 42nd birthday a fitting one. MSincccctalk 05:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
I've tweaked the offending text in the article. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
I have done all of the checks necessary to move this to prep. But prep 1 is the last so promo will have to wait. The image also is free and appropriate and should go in the image slot. Lightburst (talk) 18:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)