Template:Did you know nominations/Catharina Weiss
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Catharina Weiss
- ... that Catharina Weiss (pictured) used to play for Rolling Chocolate? Source: https://www.cannstatter-zeitung.de/inhalt.die-18-jaehrige-rollstuhlbasketballerin-gewann-im-sommer-wm-bronze-catharina-weiss-s-grosser-wurf.8363bb42-1597-463c-85fb-79e8baa49aae.html
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC).
- Intriguing hook, although the only mention in the article for chocolate is "the Rolling Chocolate in Heidelburg", which a) isn't the same thing unless you have another source saying they're sometimes called that for short and b) lacks an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 20:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Full review needed. You are welcome to take up the otiosity of that rule at WT:DYK in the interim.--Launchballer 18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Hawkeye7, review follows: article created 4 September (and nominated 5 days later) and exceeds minimum length; article is cited inline throughout with two exceptions: that her current team is "RSV Lahn-Dill" and that her disability class is "1.0" (both mentioned in the infobox and the disability class in the lead only); please can you cite these? The English language sources look to be reliable for the content cited, happy to AGF on the foreign language ones; I didn't pick up on any issue with overly close paraphrasing; image is good and properly licensed; hook is fine and loosk to check out to the German-language source (a Google search appears to confirm the team is referred to simply as "Rolling Chocolate" elsewhere); a QPQ has been carried out. If you can address the two minor citations needed this should be good to go - Dumelow (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Full review needed. You are welcome to take up the otiosity of that rule at WT:DYK in the interim.--Launchballer 18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)