The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 01:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Overall: @Andreas Wolf 01 and Paul2520: Good article but some problems. Firstly, the hooks used aren't actually mentioned and cited in the body but rather in the lead and it needs to be cited in the lead. Second, is bowman really the last person to die in ww2? Because it seems like that's just the name of the photo and not that he actually was the last person to die. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
I think it's fine now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
@Paul2520 and Onegreatjoke: This article is badly in need of copyediting. It was created as a copypasted Google translation, and the prose hasn't been much tidied since. Some examples: A triple-redundancy in the second sentence with Capa photographed the photo The Picture of the Last Man to Die, and then a strange reference to this photo as the recordings. Some odd tenses scattered throughout, eg. so that the events ... are not forgotten, an exhibition room ... has been commemorating them. The long sentence beginning For the occasion... ends in an ungrammatical non-sequitur. Some newspaper-style reporting: "Corona destroyed our café in the Capa House," explained tenant Thomas Eigler. A couple of expressions I don't understand: monument-compliant renovation and reform style architecture. For the latter phrase, the German article links to de:Reformarchitektur which doesn't have an en-wiki equivalent, so the expression should be explained for an English-speaking audience.The sources were also copypasted from the German article, so I'd like to know if these have been checked out by a German-language speaker. Some of them appear to be self-published or otherwise unreliable, and at least one is a dead link. Onegreatjoke, I see you gave a tick for adequate sourcing and free from copyvio; can I ask whether that was an AGF or did you check the sources personally? Thanks. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I had AGFed as I'm not sure how to check the reliability of non english sources. Sorry for my bad review. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
No worries, just remember to use {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} to make that clearer for latecoming nitpickers like myself. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 07:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
@Sojourner in the earth: thanks for the suggestions. I can't believe I missed some of these, but they should be fixed now.
Paul2520 has done a great job with the copyediting, but it still bothers me that nobody involved in this nomination is able to read the German sources. So I'm not prepared to sign off on this myself, but I won't stand in the way if someone else thinks it's good to go. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
it's not a great system, but we usually AGF on foreign language sources – I'll offer a tick per that. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 17:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)