Template:Did you know nominations/Buellia frigida
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Buellia frigida
- ... that the Antarctic lichen Buellia frigida has been to outer space? Source: Backhaus et al. (2019). "DNA damage of the lichen Buellia frigida after 1.5 years in space using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique" doi:10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.002
- ALT1: ... that the outer space visitor Buellia frigida grows less than 1 mm (1⁄32 in) per century? Source: doi:10.1016/j.flora.2007.05.005
- ALT2: ... that some individuals of the outer space visitor Buellia frigida have survived for more than a millennium? Source: same source as ALT1
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Royal necropolis of Byblos
- Comment: I think I'm still on the "freebie" DYK noms (let me know if I'm wrong or that's no longer a thing). Esculenta (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by Esculenta (talk). Self-nominated at 21:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Buellia frigida; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article GA new enough and article long enough. Checking ref now. This will be nomination 6, so I do believe QPQ needs will kick in now.--Kevmin § 16:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Article long enough and good enough, hooks cited and sourced. Regarding hook Alt2, am i right in associating it with the source estimate of possibly a 7000 year age?. The QPQ may work, though the age of it and that it was failed out before full review migh be considered problematic by nom promoters.--Kevmin § 19:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Everything is looking good at this stage. No policy issues seen in the article, no copyvio or close paraphrasing with the prose. I lean towards Alt0 or Alt1 as first selections for use. Good to go.--Kevmin § 19:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I moved one citation to comply with WP:DYKCRIT. Also Earwig is not working for me today: it came up zero but it is buggy for me. Bruxton (talk) 15:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
