Template:Did you know nominations/Breaking Through (2022 film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Breaking Through (2022 film)
- ... that in order to embody her acting role as a short-track speed skater in the movie Breaking Through, actress Meng Meiqi inserted a rock in one of her ice skates in order to feel real pain?
- ALT1: ... that the 2022 Chinese sports drama movie Breaking Through was shot in Northeast China at temperatures of −10 °C (14 °F)? Source: 《我心飞扬》曝海报 孟美岐领衔“四朵金花”冲金
- ALT2: ... that for her role as short-track speed skater in the movie Breaking Through, actress Meng Meiqi gained a weight of 15 kg (33 lb) in order to be closer in terms of physique of a short-track speed skater? Source: 《我心飞扬》曝海报 孟美岐领衔“四朵金花”冲金
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Daniel Chapo
Created by Toadboy123 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.
Toadboy123 (talk) 11:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC).
Full review is to follow (spot check seems to check out though for newness and length), but before the review continues, I would suggest that the article be given a copyedit. The first hook is probably the best option here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Sure. Do let me know what copyedit I should do for the article. Toadboy123 (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Both the Production and Pre-publicity and release sections are the ones in need of copyediting. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: So I have completed the copyedit on the stated sections. Do let me know how it is? Toadboy123 (talk) 13:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are still multiple grammatical issues and weird wordings in the article, such as "Winter Olympic Games but lose opportunity to win the gold medal" and "In order to present the best effect of Olympic athlete." I'll see if I can ask another editor to give this a copyedit, either Bruxton or Launchballer. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can take a look at this.--Launchballer 09:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I took out a number of clauses which were either tautologous or too nebulous to mean anything useful. I note that WP:UPSD highlights refs #6, #7, and #18 in yellow and wonder what makes them reliable, and I suggest that the single-sentence #Soundtrack section should either be expanded or merged.--Launchballer 06:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: So I have integrated the single line of 'Soundtrack' with 'Production and pre-publicity'. Are there any other aspects that needs to be rectified before the article can be all cleared for DYK? - Toadboy123 (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've moved it to another part of the article, as single-sentence paragraphs are discouraged per WP:PARAGRAPH. I'll let Narutolovehinata5 complete the rest of the review, including sources.--Launchballer 19:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: So I have integrated the single line of 'Soundtrack' with 'Production and pre-publicity'. Are there any other aspects that needs to be rectified before the article can be all cleared for DYK? - Toadboy123 (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I took out a number of clauses which were either tautologous or too nebulous to mean anything useful. I note that WP:UPSD highlights refs #6, #7, and #18 in yellow and wonder what makes them reliable, and I suggest that the single-sentence #Soundtrack section should either be expanded or merged.--Launchballer 06:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I can take a look at this.--Launchballer 09:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are still multiple grammatical issues and weird wordings in the article, such as "Winter Olympic Games but lose opportunity to win the gold medal" and "In order to present the best effect of Olympic athlete." I'll see if I can ask another editor to give this a copyedit, either Bruxton or Launchballer. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: So I have completed the copyedit on the stated sections. Do let me know how it is? Toadboy123 (talk) 13:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Both the Production and Pre-publicity and release sections are the ones in need of copyediting. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Article was new enough, long enough, and adequately sourced at the time of the nomination. Sources are all in Chinese so AGF. However, just to be sure I checked the article and the relevant sources and they all check out. A QPQ was provided; however it was a relatively incomplete reviewer that didn't explicitly check all criteria (for example bringing up the need for a QPQ or if the article was eligible), so I'm not sure if it is complete enough to count for a QPQ. I did not find any close paraphrasing. All of the hooks are cited inline, but the first hook (which is cited to an English source and mentions the hook fact) is probably the best option here. Apart from the QPQ, another minor issue is that the article is inconsistent with its date format: the article primarily use DMY, but some sentences use MDY. For consistency, the article has to stick to one or the other but not mix both. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer and Narutolovehinata5: I have fixed the date issue by making sure all of the dates in the article are DMY. Do let me know now if the article is good to go. - Toadboy123 (talk) 05:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- The issue for me now is the QPQ. I'll have to ask other editors like Schwede66, RoySmith, or SL93 if the provided QPQ is complete enough to count (because to me it seems uncomplete), or if a new QPQ will need to be provided. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to hit all the important stuff to me. Was there something in particular that you think is missing? RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: It forgot to check for newness and length, for one thing, as well as not acknowledging the nom's QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, those things do indeed check out, whether they mentioned them or not. So maybe a {{minnow}} to Toadboy123 to encourage him to be more comprehensive the next time and I think that handles it. RoySmith (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, can this get the tick given that the hook is supposed to be in a the SOHA for a date that is already available in the prep set? Schwede66 22:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I had only been waiting for Toadboy123 to respond to the above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Schwede66, Narutolovehinata5, and RoySmith: Sorry for not responding to your comments as I was not notified about those and I was busy in preparing another article. Regarding the QPQ reviews, I will be more articulate and ensure to cover all aspects of it in future DYK articles. Anyway, thank you for the DYK review and approval. - Toadboy123 (talk) 20:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, can this get the tick given that the hook is supposed to be in a the SOHA for a date that is already available in the prep set? Schwede66 22:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, those things do indeed check out, whether they mentioned them or not. So maybe a {{minnow}} to Toadboy123 to encourage him to be more comprehensive the next time and I think that handles it. RoySmith (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: It forgot to check for newness and length, for one thing, as well as not acknowledging the nom's QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to hit all the important stuff to me. Was there something in particular that you think is missing? RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- The issue for me now is the QPQ. I'll have to ask other editors like Schwede66, RoySmith, or SL93 if the provided QPQ is complete enough to count (because to me it seems uncomplete), or if a new QPQ will need to be provided. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
