Template:Did you know nominations/Blalock, Oregon
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blalock, Oregon
[edit]... that Blalock, Oregon, was inundated by the backwaters from John Day Dam?
- Reviewed: Francisco D'Andrade
Created by Valfontis (talk), 78.26 (talk). Nominated by 78.26 (talk) at 15:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC).
- Comment I didn't create it, 78.26, you did, but thanks for the nod. :)
- Comment I may have created it but Valfontis wrote most of it. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook is sourced to an offline book and is accepted in good faith. The article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing issues. The article and hook use the word "backwaters" which from my UK perspective means the quiet shallows at the edge of a river away from the main current. How about ALT1 instead? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1
... that Blalock, Oregon, was inundated by the rising waters of the newly impounded Lake Umatilla?
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thank you for bringing this to attention. The problem is that I have my doubts that Lake Umatilla is mentioned by the source, and would therefore not be directly attributable. Come to think of it, I never thought of that area as a lake, just part of the Columbia River. I hope @Valfontis: will comment, as she has ready access to the cited source, I believe. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think OGN mentions Lake Umatilla, so I believe the suggested hook is a bit of synthesis. If I have time today I'll try to think of something else. Off the top of my head, I think a more interesting hook would have to do with moving the cemetery (see the talk page), but I don't know how readily available the sources are to be able to add that to the article. Valfontis (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know anything about the geography of the region, but your hook states that Blalock was inundated as a result of the construction of the John Day Dam and our article on the dam states that Lake Umatilla is formed by the impoundment of the dam, so I don't see much synthesis there. How about
- I don't think OGN mentions Lake Umatilla, so I believe the suggested hook is a bit of synthesis. If I have time today I'll try to think of something else. Off the top of my head, I think a more interesting hook would have to do with moving the cemetery (see the talk page), but I don't know how readily available the sources are to be able to add that to the article. Valfontis (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thank you for bringing this to attention. The problem is that I have my doubts that Lake Umatilla is mentioned by the source, and would therefore not be directly attributable. Come to think of it, I never thought of that area as a lake, just part of the Columbia River. I hope @Valfontis: will comment, as she has ready access to the cited source, I believe. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that Blalock, Oregon, was inundated by rising waters after the John Day Dam was constructed? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that works. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT2 hook; previous hooks have been struck due to issues raised. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
