Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Berberis koreana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Berberis koreana

[edit]

Korean Barberry (berberis koreana) in spring

  • ... that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
*ALT1:... that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is delicious and intoxicating?
  • ALT2:... that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
  • Reviewed: Max Charles
  • Comment: Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's?

Created/expanded by Katewright54 (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 16:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

  • hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--Kevmin § 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach WP:MEDRS. 86.139.213.143 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3?

I'm fine with ALT3 if it's verified properly; also, I scrapped out my hooks. Let's wait for a reviewer. By the way, how can a bot credit Orlady? --George Ho (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm good with the alt 3 hook, and adjustments made to the article re:medical claims. I will agf the jams and jellies reference. --Kevmin § 23:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)