Template:Did you know nominations/Avigdor Glogauer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by SL93 (talk) 02:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Withdrawn

Avigdor Glogauer

(

)

... that a letter from Moses Mendelssohn convinced the authorities to release Avigdor Glogauer from prison? Source: Davidson, Israel (1901). "Abigdor ben Simḥa". In Singer, Isidore; et al. (eds.). The Jewish Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. p. 59.
- ALT1: ... that Avigdor Glogauer's Hebrew grammar was published with an approbation by Rabbi Yechezkel Landau? Source: Zwiep, Irene E. (2002–2003). "Imagined Speech Communities: Western Ashkenazi Multilingualism as Reflected in Eighteenth-Century Grammars of Hebrew". Studia Rosenthaliana. 36: 99. JSTOR 41482644.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Harrat Khaybar

Created by Ploni (talk). Self-nominated at 16:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC).

Hi Ploni, thanks for your work on this article. According to WP:DYKCRIT #2: Text copied verbatim from public domain sources, or which closely paraphrases such sources, is excluded both from the 1,500 minimum character count for new articles, and from the ×5 expansion count for ×5 expanded articles. Excluding the public domain Jewish Encyclopedia parts, I don't think this is currently long enough. DanCherek (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Good point—that hadn't crossed my mind. Copyvio Detector claims there's a 54.0% similarity with the Jewish Encyclopedia, leaving about 1,000 characters of non-PD material, so I suppose it wouldn't meet the eligibility criteria. Thank you for in any case! –Ploni (talk) 23:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  - Ploni What would you like to do in regard to the nomination? SL93 (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
    - I say go ahead and mark it as "not passed" under the circumstances (I don't have the time right now to expand it). –Ploni (talk) 02:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)