Template:Did you know nominations/Aroha Bridge

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Aroha Bridge

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that New Zealand animated comedy Aroha Bridge was renamed from the previous title, Hook Ups, after fans of the cartoon found pornography when looking up the show? Source: "Now it's back for a second series, launching to coincide with Maori Language Week, and rebranded with a new name - Aroha Bridge - because of problems when fans googled "hook ups". "People would come up to me and say 'I really wanted to watch your cartoon, but I just ended up with lots of porn on my computer', so, yeah, we blatantly realised we needed to change the name," Hansell explains." "Kiwi web series renamed over porn problems". NZ Herald. 1 July 2016.
  • ALT0a: ... that Aroha Bridge changed its name from Hook Ups because fans searching for the show often found pornography instead?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Anju Gurung
  • Comment: Probably my last DYK nomination for a bit until I finish up the ongoing two nominations and review. Thank you in advance to the reviewer and I hope they have a wonderful day!

Created by Ornithoptera (talk). Self-nominated at 01:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC).

• *

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new and long enough. Well sourced, as well as being an overall ok article. Nothing great, nothing terrible. This is my first DYK review, so I ask another reviewer for a second opinion. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 21:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

• Gonna ping @Theleekycauldron: for a second opinion! Thanks leek for your help in advance, also @Fakescientist8000: welcome to DYK! Hope you enjoy your time here! Ornithoptera (talk) 22:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Ornithoptera: Thank you for your warm welcome! I hope I enjoy DYK too. I'm mainly a regular at ITN, but I decided "Hey, why not step out of my comfort zone for once?" Cheers! Fakescientist8000 22:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Welcome to DYK, Fakescientist8000! Your review looks great; I would point out that when users click through from the hook to the article, and they want to see the source, the first place they'll go is the citation right at the end of the article. Right now, that's Hayden 2019, but I'd argue that the NZ Herald source is much stronger and should be used there instead. I also did some copyediting here and there- great work, both of you! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)