This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
A fact from Aroha Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Aroha Bridge changed its name from Hook Ups because fans searching for the show often found pornography instead?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Probably my last DYK nomination for a bit until I finish up the ongoing two nominations and review. Thank you in advance to the reviewer and I hope they have a wonderful day!
Overall: Article is new and long enough. Well sourced, as well as being an overall ok article. Nothing great, nothing terrible. This is my first DYK review, so I ask another reviewer for a second opinion. Cheers! Fakescientist800021:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to DYK, Fakescientist8000! Your review looks great; I would point out that when users click through from the hook to the article, and they want to see the source, the first place they'll go is the citation right at the end of the article. Right now, that's Hayden 2019, but I'd argue that the NZ Herald source is much stronger and should be used there instead. I also did some copyediting here and there- great work, both of you! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]