Template:Did you know nominations/Archean felsic volcanic rocks
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
No response to multiple pings; nomination closed as unsuccessful after nearly four months
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Archean felsic volcanic rocks
[edit]
Archean felsic volcanic rock containing fiamme structure
- ... that all Archean felsic volcanic rocks (sample pictured) are located in greenstone belts? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/000925419390140E
- Reviewed: Passport to Pimlico
- Comment: Student work for Regional Geology at HKU
Moved to mainspace by Ivancyyip (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 04:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, heavily referenced. Impressive effort - shame I hardly understand a word of it! Agf on hook; Earwig finds nothing. But whatever the image is, it isn't a "sample". Johnbod (talk) 23:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ivancyyip:Hi I came by to promote this but the article is still an orphan. Please fix this and then we can proceed. Johnbod in case he doesn't return, could you help out a little with this too? thx kindly VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Better someone who understands the subject a bit - Graeme Bartlett? Johnbod (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have removed the orphan tag. No understanding is required to remove that. I also voted to delete the orphan tag, but so far the majority of Wikipedians do not support that yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Can I trouble you to verify the hook source for me by quoting please so that I can promote? I don't understand a single thing in the source XD VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 07:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- I am trying to find an understandable reference that supports this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Can I trouble you to verify the hook source for me by quoting please so that I can promote? I don't understand a single thing in the source XD VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 07:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have removed the orphan tag. No understanding is required to remove that. I also voted to delete the orphan tag, but so far the majority of Wikipedians do not support that yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Better someone who understands the subject a bit - Graeme Bartlett? Johnbod (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Any updates? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- My problem is that really the hook is justified by table1 that is supported by many different references. So the hook is difficult to prove, especially the "all" bit. So I will have another hook: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- alt1 That Archean felsic volcanic rocks have a lower alkali content than their modern counterparts?Looking to reference this from Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: Contrasting results from surface samples and shales. by C.Condie -- quotes to follow
- @Graeme Bartlett: Any updates for the quotes? I've been assuming you still have things to add up on. We might need to hurry this since it has been around 3 months here. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 06:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Marking for closure; no response from the nominator for this nomination and other related DYK nominations from the same course, despite multiple pings. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
