Template:Did you know nominations/Arbeiter-Schutzbund

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Arbeiter-Schutzbund

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Senate of the Free City of Danzig banned the Social Democratic Workers Defense Union after its militants killed a 16-year old SA member during a fight in the village of Ober Kahlbude?
• ALT1: ... that in 1931, the Senate of the Free City of Danzig banned the Social Democratic Workers Defense Union after its militants had killed a 16-year old SA member? (Daniluk, Jan (2013). SS w Gdańsku: wybrane zagadnienia (in Polish). Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu Oddział w Gdańsku. pp. 44–46, 75–76. ISBN 978-83-7629-398-1. Andrzejewski, Marek (1980). Socjaldemokratyczna Partia Wolnego Miasta Gdańska: 1920-1936 (in Polish). Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. pp. 136–138. ISBN 978-83-04-00706-2.)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kantibhai Patel

Created by Soman (talk). Self-nominated at 21:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Arbeiter-Schutzbund; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Munfarid1 (talk) 11:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

@Munfarid1: Not the nominator but I struck ALT0 since it's a bit long (but technically under 200 characters). The hook is cited to refs 2 and 6 in the article. BuySomeApples (talk) 11:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Soman:, as soon as you add the source for this in the nomination template, I can give it clearance. Munfarid1 (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

@Munfarid1: I added the full citation to the nom for @Soman: but tbh you can usually promote a hook if it's cited in the article, that's where the ref actually needs to be. BuySomeApples (talk) 13:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

@BuySomeApples: thank you for your help in completing this nomination. As the source is a required item on the template for reviewers, I hesitated to to give it an okay. But now it's good for the next step. :) Munfarid1 (talk) 17:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

@Soman and Munfarid1: The hook strikes me as too confusing for the general, uninformed reader. Perhaps something on how this group was formed to defend Danzig from the growing Nazi party? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Timing this nomination out as the nominator has been inactive for a month and no new hooks have been proposed in a week. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)