Template:Did you know nominations/Anita Kiki Gbeho
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Anita Kiki Gbeho
- ... that Anita Kiki Gbeho is still working for the UN in Somalia, even though her boss was lucky to escape assassination? Source: her boss is the special envoy - she is one of his deputies (see article
- Comment: Nice for Black History month and if it is slow then International Women's Day? Feel free to add an alt or fix or improve the article.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Maud Holland
Created by Victuallers (talk) and Cmwaura (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 11:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC).
- don’t have time to suggest an alt right now, but I’d like to see one focusing on her rather than her boss. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome to add one. However the point is (meant to be) that SHE! is working in a dangerous place and the evidence is that her boss has targeted by terrorists. Victuallers (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - The infobox claim that she has one child is unsourced.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Solid article. I've added {{Translated}} to the talk page to ensure clear attribution. I'm fine with the current hook, but would be happy to review an alt hook if someone wants to suggest one. My only concern: the claim in the infobox that she has one child needs to be cited or removed. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Would you be able to address the sourcing issue please? Once that is resolved, I'll be happy to approve. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, thanks for the review @Mx. Granger:, done. Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, good to go. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P6