Template:Did you know nominations/Anguojun
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Roniius informed me on Discord that he is on Wikibreak and will be unable to return to the nomination at this time.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ankuochun
- ... that the Zhili-Shandong Army in the Ankuochun had a regiment of 2,000 boys averaging 10 years old that used specially-made short guns? Philip Jowett (20 November 2013). China’s Wars: Rousing the Dragon 1894-1949. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 121–2. ISBN 978-1-4728-0673-4.
ALT1:... that generals of the Ankuochun proposed a new principle for the Three Principles of the People, named Minde (People's Morality)? Chi Man Kwong (28 February 2017). War and Geopolitics in Interwar Manchuria: Zhang Zuolin and the Fengtian Clique during the Northern Expedition. BRILL. p. 123. ISBN 978-90-04-34084-8.
- Reviewed: Captain Tilly Park
Moved to mainspace by Roniius (talk). Self-nominated at 02:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC).
Hi Roniius, review follows: article created 22 January; article is of good length and well written; article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't spot any overly cvlose paraphrasing from the sources I checked; first hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by the cited source; I struck the second hook as I didn't find it interesting enough, sorry; just waiting for a QPQ I think. Great work - Dumelow (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Please put this DYK on hold. I have discovered some substantial issues with the article. RGloucester — ☎ 11:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Dispute over the issue has been solved, but substantial changes will have to be made to the article. ALT0, however, will not be removed. This DYK may be able to go ahead once the issue is fully resolved, or it may be able to go ahead now. Roniius (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- This dispute has not been resolved. The article is still in a state of flux while non-related content is moved out, and the scope adjusted. This article is not yet fit to be placed on the main page. RGloucester — ☎ 09:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Dispute over the issue has been solved, but substantial changes will have to be made to the article. ALT0, however, will not be removed. This DYK may be able to go ahead once the issue is fully resolved, or it may be able to go ahead now. Roniius (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Roniius, Dumelow, and RGloucester:} It's been about a week since the last edits to the article, is everything good to go now here? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- The article is somewhat in order, but the title has yet to be made clear. RGloucester — ☎ 09:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps the hook could be reworded? It sounds a bit strange to me, as if it's a run-off sentence. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- The article is somewhat in order, but the title has yet to be made clear. RGloucester — ☎ 09:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)