Template:Did you know nominations/Angel tube station
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Angel tube station
[edit]References
- ^ Day & Reed 2010, p. 197.
- ^ "Náměstí Míru". Prague Metro. Archived from the original on 6 April 2015. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
- ^ Städje, Jörgen (18 October 2009). "Rulltrappor – så funkar de (in Swedish)". IDG News Service. Archived from the original on 4 April 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
- ^ "Kamppi metro station". HKL. 14 December 2009. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
Created/expanded by Vincent60030 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC).
- I have attempted to check the references. I find I am unable to check the book, one of the others comes up as Nicht Gefunden. I am not sure how Kamppi's 31 meter depth relates to the longest escalators. Are we looking at Deepest overall with escalator access, Deepest single escalator, longest escalator? I think more precision is needed. It has potential, but the hook and the citations need to be absolutely on the money. Fiddle Faddle 14:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Well, as said on the text, it is a website and I mentioned it as "escalators", not a single one. I have also changed the Prague Metro reference to a correct one already, and is in English! :) Vincent60030 (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- I considered the plural to encompass one down and one up, a pair. No matter. Since it is a set of escalators that is also fine. I tend towards asking for that level of precision on the hook, but I am by no means the final arbiter of this DYK. More expert eyes than mine will need to approve it. Fiddle Faddle 15:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Timtrent: Can you please try to find some experts to review this? Thanks. ;) Vincent60030 (talk) 16:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed to give this a complete review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Various subsections have been used under Notes and references which is really not usual standard. I can be convinced otherwise if Vincent60030 suggests that why they adopted this style. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Can we please have an actual complete review here that mentions the usual DYK criteria? Formatting of the notes and references section is not a DYK criterion, and should not affect the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Apart from the question that I had asked above, there are no problems with the article. I would support "that Angel has the fourth longest escalators (pictured) in Western Europe?" OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- @OccultZone: Well, don't really get what you mean but it is actually usual if you look at other articles about the London Underground stations. For example: Holborn tube station. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 11:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- then. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- @OccultZone: Well, don't really get what you mean but it is actually usual if you look at other articles about the London Underground stations. For example: Holborn tube station. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 11:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Apart from the question that I had asked above, there are no problems with the article. I would support "that Angel has the fourth longest escalators (pictured) in Western Europe?" OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)