Template:Did you know nominations/Alliance for Peace and Democracy (Hong Kong)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Alliance for Peace and Democracy (Hong Kong)
[edit]- ... that the pro-Beijing Alliance for Peace and Democracy was established to counter the Occupy Central with Love and Peace movement?
Created by Dps04 (talk) and Ohconfucius (talk). Nominated by Skr15081997 (talk) at 13:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC).
This is pretty much good to go. It's easily long enough, no sign of copyvio/close paraphrasing, it was new enough when it was nominated and of course the hook checks out. I just worry a little about the "controversies" subsections. I can imagine it's difficult with an article on a contentious topic like this (and kudos for writing an article on an unpopular subject), but words like "numerous" (cf. WP:PEACOCK) and phrases like "suffered a major credibility crisis", "rampant media reports", and "Numerous media captured video footage of what appears to be people being paid to take part in the parade" (my emphasis) strike me as editorialising. It should take about five minutes to name the news sources, remove or clarify peacock terms, and either remove or attribute the 'credibility crisis' clause. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above issues have been resolved. Thanks for the review.--Skr15081997 (talk) 06:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: the above issues have been fixed.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Works for me. Good to go. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
