Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Aimee Richardson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Article has been deleted; closing nomination as unsuccessful.

Aimee Richardson

[edit]

Created by Janet-O (talk). Self-nominated at 21:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Hi Janet-O, review follows: Article created 11 November; I count 1495 characters excluding headers, references etc. (per rule A2) so it is very slightly below the minimum required length; Article is fully cited to reliable sources for the topic; no close paraphrasing detected; Hooks are interesting and check out, they are also inline cited in the article; QPQ has been done. I prefer the second hook to avoid repetition of princess and I think it is more to the point. No issues except for being very slightly under length - Dumelow (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @Dumelow: I've pushed it over 1,500 now. Thank you for your help with this! Janet-O (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Aimee Richardson
Aimee Richardson
Yep, good to go now Janet-O. I don't like to quibble over so few characters but the line has to be drawn somewhere, I suppose. To the pre-builders, there is a free image available for this subject (right), if desired - Dumelow (talk) 23:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)